Thursday, October 15, 2015

Legal Geek No. 54: DC Defends the Superman Trademarks with Vigor!

Welcome back to Legal Geek. This week, we take a look at how DC Comics is continuing to defend the long-standing trademarks in Krypton and Kryptonite against the forces of evil, AKA, trademark dilution.

https://archive.org/details/LegalGeekEp54

Superman started as a comic book in 1938 but further trademarks were developed in 1943 for Krypton and Kryptonite, which of course is the fictional material capable of weakening the Man of Steel. Krypton is a real element on the periodic chart as well as Superman's home planet, but that has not stopped DC Comics from continuing to actively use the mark and establish continued rights of the trademark (via secondary meaning to consumers, if nothing else).

As we've covered before on this segment, part of properly maintaining trademark rights is stopping others from cutting in on the mark and diluting it, such as by confusing consumers about the source of goods and services. The battle likely never ends with marks like Krypton, which have scientific as well as fictional roots. Just this month, DC Comics has actively engaged in legal disputes with two potential competitors using Krypton or Kryptonite marks.

In October 2014, Ravensmoon Productions filed a trademark application to register the Kryptonite Vapor mark and logo that the company uses with electronic cigarette refill cartridges. This product has been sold since 2013 using the mark without much fuss from DC. But many times, the application for a trademark is precisely what causes an original trademark holder to more vigorously defend their own rights, and that's what happened here.

DC Comics recently filed an opposition in the US Trademark Office against the allowance of Ravensmoon's application, and it looks Ravensmoon has no interest in a fight with the Man of Steel. They have announced on their website that the product formerly known as Kryptonite Vapor is now sold as Ravens Moon Vapor. So fear not, citizens of Metropolis, your teenagers won't be confused about whether their favorite vaping cartridges are officially licensed by DC Comics anymore.

While Ravensmoon may be a smaller company not willing to take on the likes of DC Comics, a much bigger company is also now at odds with this Superman IP in a similar fashion. Just this week, DC Comics filed an extension of time to oppose Chevrolet's own trademark applications for Krypton and Camaro Krypton in a class that covers automobiles. This trademark application has led to some rampant speculation about what project Chevrolet has in mind for these trademarks, including some assumptions that it has something to do with DC Comics (which clearly we now know is not the case).

Unlike some other DC superhero like Batman and his bat mobile, there's not an immediate obvious tie between Superman and automobiles. However, the mark is 70 years old and is so strong that consumers very well may assume at this point that Chevy's use of Krypton has something to do with DC Comics. That's the open question that will need to be decided by the Trademark Office or a court if DC Comics goes forth with an opposition or a trademark infringement lawsuit.

It will be fascinating to see what this project is, if it ever sees the light of day, and whether these two mega companies are willing to make a deal over this famous Superman IP. Keep an eye on these giants and the potential rare trademark battle between relative equals as far as legal backing and funding go.

Bottom Line: we can learn a lot from watching creative companies like DC Comics defend trademarks like the Superman IP, and one of this life lessons is to avoid filing trademarks that compete like Ravensmoon and Chevrolet has unless you are ready to fight a tough legal battle.

Until next time, don't go leaping buildings in a single bound without requesting a license from DC Comics.

----------------------------------

Thanks for reading. Please provide feedback and legal-themed questions as segment suggestions to me on Twitter @BuckeyeFitzy

No comments:

Post a Comment